Resolute files racketeering suit against Greenpeace

六月 8, 2016
Resolute Forest Products Inc. announced a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia against Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace Fund, Inc., STAND (formerly ForestEthics) and a number of their associates. The complaint included federal racketeering claims and racketeering, trademark, defamation and tortious interference claims under Georgia law.  

These alleged claims arise from, among other things, Greenpeace's self-described "Resolute:  Forest Destroyer" campaign falsely accusing Resolute of, among other things:  (a) "destroying endangered forests," and "operating and sourcing wood . . . in violation of law"; (b) causing the "destruction of endangered species" and "critical caribou habitat" and risking a "Caribou Herd Death Spiral," "extirpation" and "extinction;" (c) "abandoning" and "impoverishing" the Boreal's indigenous communities; and (d) impairing the Boreal's ability to mitigate climate change.

The complaint describes in detail the falsity of these and other malicious and defamatory accusations. Among other things, the complaint explains that far from being a "forest destroyer," Resolute has planted well over a billion trees in the Boreal – which is a billion more than Greenpeace – and is responsible for virtually no permanent lost forest acreage. The complaint also demonstrates that Resolute also has not impaired the Boreal's ability to absorb greenhouse gases, and, instead, has improved that ability through harvesting and forestation as recognized and encouraged by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Nor has Resolute abandoned, exploited or impoverished First Nations or other communities within the Boreal forest, but instead – and again unlike Greenpeace – has created and sustained substantial benefits for these peoples through shared economic participation in the forestry business. The complaint also details how, to support its false accusations, Greenpeace has fabricated evidence and events, including, for example, staged photos falsely purporting to show Resolute logging in prohibited areas and as having harvested areas that were actually impacted by fire.

"Our company strives for the highest standards of environmental stewardship, which is why the attacks on us are so obviously cynical and thoroughly irresponsible. We have an obligation to our business ethics, and our many shareholders, customers, partners and stakeholders to draw the line after all other means have been exhausted," stated Richard Garneau, Resolute's President and Chief Executive Officer.

Resolute is seeking compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial as well as treble and punitive damages, and is represented by Michael J. Bowe from Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP. Resolute's counsel is continuing its investigation of Greenpeace's campaign and practices, and one can provide information on a confidential basis by telephone at 212 542-4700. A website has also been established (resolutevgreenpeace.com) to catalog information and progress reports on the case and, when necessary, to set the record straight as the facts warrant.




評論

喜歡這一點,你需要註冊。
要做到這一點,請輸入您的姓名和電子郵件地址。
名稱:
姓:
電子郵件:
性別:
如果您已經註冊,
請輸入您的詳細信息 這裡
要留下意見,你需要註冊。
要做到這一點,請輸入您的姓名和電子郵件地址。
名稱:
姓:
電子郵件:
性別:
如果您已經註冊,
請輸入您的詳細信息 這裡
我們歡迎通過相關的意見和數據推動故事的評論。如果你看到一個評論,您認為是無關緊要的或不適當的,可以將其標記為我們的編輯使用報告濫用鏈接。在表達意見的看法,並不代表Lesprom網絡。有關我們註釋策略的更多信息,請參見: http://www.lesprom.com/legal/comment_policy/
返回頁首