The Helsinki District Court dismissed the claim of Metsähallitus against UPM

市場: 圆木
六月 23, 2016
The Helsinki District Court has rendered a judgement whereby it has dismissed the damages claim of Metsähallitus against UPM, Stora Enso Corporation and Metsäliitto Cooperative, which was based on the competition restriction concerning the raw wood market found by the Marker Court decision of 3 December 2009.

The District Court ordered Metsähallitus to pay UPM compensation for legal expenses.

According to Metsähallitus' claim, the forestry companies had caused damage to Metsähallitus on the basis of the competition restriction found by the Market Court decision of 3 December 2009.

Metsähallitus claimed that due to the competition restriction the forestry companies had paid underprice to Metsähallitus in raw wood sales contracts. The capital amount of Metsähallitus' claim was in total approximately Euro 159.4 million, of which approximately Euro 22.6 million was based on agreements between Metsähallitus and UPM.

UPM agrees with the District Court ruling. UPM maintains that it has not caused the alleged damage to Metsähallitus. Metsähallitus may appeal the District Court judgment to the Court of Appeal.

Through the renewing of the bio and forest industries, UPM is building a sustainable future across six business areas: UPM Biorefining, UPM Energy, UPM Raflatac, UPM Paper Asia, UPM Paper ENA and UPM Plywood.



評論

喜歡這一點,你需要註冊。
要做到這一點,請輸入您的姓名和電子郵件地址。
名稱:
姓:
電子郵件:
性別:
如果您已經註冊,
請輸入您的詳細信息 這裡
要留下意見,你需要註冊。
要做到這一點,請輸入您的姓名和電子郵件地址。
名稱:
姓:
電子郵件:
性別:
如果您已經註冊,
請輸入您的詳細信息 這裡
我們歡迎通過相關的意見和數據推動故事的評論。如果你看到一個評論,您認為是無關緊要的或不適當的,可以將其標記為我們的編輯使用報告濫用鏈接。在表達意見的看法,並不代表Lesprom網絡。有關我們註釋策略的更多信息,請參見: http://www.lesprom.com/legal/comment_policy/
返回頁首