Ghana signs agreement with World Bank to cut carbon emissions and reduce deforestation

市場: 标准木材
发表了 七月 17, 2019
1
Ghana - with one of the highest deforestation rates in Africa – has become the third country to sign a landmark agreement with the World Bank that rewards community efforts to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation.

Ghana’s five-year Emission Reductions Payment Agreement (ERPA) with the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Carbon Fund, which is administered by the World Bank, unlocks performance-based payments of up to $50 million for carbon emission reductions from the forest and land use sectors.

In Ghana, forest degradation and deforestation are driven primarily by cocoa farm expansion, coupled with logging and a recent increase in illegal mining. Working in close partnership with the Forestry Commission, Cocoa Board, and private sector, Ghana’s program with the FCPF Carbon Fund seeks to reduce carbon emissions through the promotion of climate-smart cocoa production.

In Ghana’s ERPA, the FCPF Carbon Fund commits to making initial results-based payments for reductions of 10 million tons of CO2 emissions (up to US$50 million). Ghana’s ERPA also specifies on carbon emission baselines, price per ton of avoided CO2 emissions, and a benefit-sharing mechanism that has been prepared based on extensive consultations with local stakeholders and civil society organizations throughout the country.

Ghana’s emission reductions program area, located in the south of the country, covers almost 6 million hectares (ha) of the West Africa Guinean Forest biodiversity hotspot. The wider program area covers 1.2 million ha of forest reserves and national parks and is home to 12 million people.

+7 499 6535608
Ordzhonikidze, 11 109028 莫斯科, 俄國

評論

喜歡這一點,你需要註冊。
要做到這一點,請輸入您的姓名和電子郵件地址。
名稱:
姓:
電子郵件:
性別:
如果您已經註冊,
請輸入您的詳細信息 這裡
Let’s hope this doesn’t follow the same track as the carbon-offset program that saw forest clearing and then planting of non-native eucalyptus trees in Costa Rica, with the landowner benefitting on both. Of course, it was a net loss of carbon to the atmosphere, not to mention biodiversity loss. This will require large-scale oversight.
04.08.19 13:39
要留下意見,你需要註冊。
要做到這一點,請輸入您的姓名和電子郵件地址。
名稱:
姓:
電子郵件:
性別:
如果您已經註冊,
請輸入您的詳細信息 這裡
我們歡迎通過相關的意見和數據推動故事的評論。如果你看到一個評論,您認為是無關緊要的或不適當的,可以將其標記為我們的編輯使用報告濫用鏈接。在表達意見的看法,並不代表Lesprom網絡。有關我們註釋策略的更多信息,請參見: https://www.lesprom.com/legal/comment_policy/
返回頁首